Aim:

This study evaluated the mechanical behavior of implant-supported crowns obtained by different fabrication technique after thermomechanical cycling.

Methods:

Thirty-two external hexagon dental implants were divided into four groups (n=10): CC – conventional casting with torch; EI – electromagnetic induction casting; PL – plasma casting; and CAD-CAM – milling through computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing. Vickers microhardness of the specimens were made before and after the thermomechanical cycling, and then subjected to fracture load. Fracture pattern was evaluated.

Results:

No significant difference was observed comparing the microhardness before and after thermomechanical cycling. CAD-CAM group presented significant lower microhardness than the other groups. No significant statistical difference was showed on fracture load between the groups. The CAD-CAM and PL presented lower number of failure by plastic deformation.

Conclusion:

The manufacturing techniques affected the mechanical behavior and the failure pattern of implant-supported crowns tested