Diagnostic performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay in BAL fluid samples from patients under clinical suspicion of pulmonary tuberculosis: a tertiary care experience in a high-tuberculosis-burden area

Brito, Guilherme Machado Xavier de; Mafort, Thiago Thomaz; Ribeiro-Alves, Marcelo; Reis, Larissa Vieira Tavares dos; Leung, Janaína; Leão, Robson Souza; Rufino, Rogério; Rodrigues, Luciana Silva

ABSTRACT Objective:

To assess the diagnostic performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay, a rapid molecular test for tuberculosis, comparing it with that of AFB staining and culture, in BAL fluid (BALF) samples from patients with clinically suspected pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) who are sputum smear-negative or produce sputum samples of insufficient quantity.

Methods:

This was a retrospective study of 140 cases of suspected PTB in patients who were smear-negative or produced insufficient sputum samples and were evaluated at a tertiary teaching hospital in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. All of the patients underwent fiberoptic bronchoscopy with BAL. The BALF specimens were evaluated by AFB staining, mycobacterial culture, and the Xpert MTB/RIF assay.

Results:

Among the 140 patients, results for all three microbiological examinations were available for 73 (52.1%), of whom 22 tested positive on culture, 17 tested positive on AFB staining, and 20 tested positive on the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy for AFB staining were 68.1%, 96.1%, 88.2%, 87.5%, and 87.6%, respectively, compared with 81.8%, 96.1%, 90.0%, 92.4%, and 91.8%, respectively, for the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. The agreement between AFB staining and culture was 82.3% (kappa = 0.46; p < 0.0001), whereas that between the Xpert MTB/RIF assay and culture was 91.8% (kappa = 0.8; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions:

In BALF samples, the Xpert MTB/RIF assay performs better than do traditional methods, providing a reliable alternative to sputum analysis in suspected cases of PTB. However, the rate of discordant results merits careful consideration.

RESUMO Objetivo:

Avaliar o desempenho diagnóstico do teste Xpert MTB/RIF - teste molecular rápido para tuberculose, comparando-o com o da pesquisa de BAAR e da cultura, em amostras de LBA de pacientes com suspeita clínica de tuberculose pulmonar (TBP) que apresentam baciloscopia de escarro negativa ou produzem amostras com quantidade insuficiente de escarro.

Métodos:

Estudo retrospectivo de 140 casos suspeitos de TBP em pacientes que apresentaram baciloscopia negativa ou produziram amostras de escarro insuficientes e foram avaliados em um hospital-escola terciário na cidade do Rio de Janeiro (RJ). Todos os pacientes foram submetidos à fibrobroncoscopia com LBA. Os espécimes de LBA foram avaliados por meio da realização de pesquisa de BAAR, cultura para micobactérias e teste Xpert MTB/RIF.

Resultados:

Entre os 140 pacientes, resultados de todos os três exames microbiológicos estavam disponíveis para 73 (52,1%), dos quais 22 apresentaram cultura positiva, 17, pesquisa de BAAR positiva, e 20, teste Xpert MTB/RIF positivo. A sensibilidade, especificidade, valor preditivo positivo, valor preditivo negativo e precisão global da pesquisa de BAAR foram de 68,1%, 96,1%, 88,2%, 87,5% e 87,6%, respectivamente, contra 81,8%, 96,1%, 90,0%, 92,4% e 91,8%, respectivamente, do teste Xpert MTB/RIF. A concordância entre a pesquisa de BAAR e a cultura foi de 82,3% (kappa = 0,46; p < 0,0001), enquanto a concordância entre o teste Xpert MTB/RIF e a cultura foi de 91,8% (kappa = 0,8; p < 0,0001).

Conclusões:

Em amostras de LBA, o teste Xpert MTB/RIF tem melhor desempenho do que os métodos tradicionais, fornecendo uma alternativa confiável à análise do escarro em casos suspeitos de TBP. No entanto, a taxa de resultados discordantes merece uma reflexão cuidadosa.