Perineostomy: the last oportunity
Int. braz. j. urol; 41 (1), 2015
Publication year: 2015
Objective To review the technique and outcome of perineal urethrostomy or urethral perineostomy and to identify factors related to the procedure failure. Material and methods We studied 17 patients who underwent perineal urethrostomy between 2009-2013 in a single hospital. Success was defined as no need for additional surgical treatment or urethral dilatation. We reviewed the clinical data related to age, weight, previous urethral surgery, diabetes, hypertension, ischemic cardiopathy, lichen sclerosus and other causes and studied their association with the procedure failure (univariate analysis). We completed the analysis with a multivariate test based on binary regression. Results The average follow-up was 39.41 months. From all the causes, we found Lichen Sclerosus in 35%, idiopathic etiology in 29% and prior hypospadia repair in 18%. Postoperative failure occurred in 3 patients, with a final success of 82.4%. The binary regression model showed as independent risk factors ischemic cardiopathy (OR: 2.34), and the presence of Lichen Sclerosis (OR: 3.21). Conclusions The success rate with the perineal urethrostomy technique shows it to be a valid option above all when we preserve the urethral blood supply and plate. Lichen sclerosus and ischemic vascular problems are risk factors to re-stenosis. .
Análisis de Varianza, Balanitis Xerótica Obliterante/complicaciones, Estudios de Seguimiento, Liquen Escleroso y Atrófico/complicaciones, Persona de Mediana Edad, Estomía/métodos, Perineo/cirugía, Radiografía, Análisis de Regresión, Reproducibilidad de los Resultados, Estudios Retrospectivos, Factores de Riesgo, Insuficiencia del Tratamiento, Uretra/diagnóstico por imagen, Uretra/cirugía, Estrechez Uretral/cirugía, Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos