Surveillance for leptospirosis in the Americas, 1996-2005: a review of data from ministries of health
Vigilancia de la leptospirosis en la Región de las Américas, de 1996 al 2005: análisis de los datos de los ministerios de salud
Rev. panam. salud pública; 32 (3), 2012
Publication year: 2012
Objective. To characterize current leptospirosis reporting practices in the Americas.Methods. Information was collected from the official websites of national ministries ofhealth from the Americas region and two international organizations; personal communications;and three international morbidity databases. For all sources other than the morbiditydatabases, the review was limited to official reports citing clinically suspected and laboratoryconfirmed leptospirosis cases or deaths during the period 19962005.Results. A total of 73 out of 1 644 reports met the selection criteria and were included inthe analysis. Published leptospirosis data were available from half of the countries/sovereignterritories (24 out of 48), and 18 of them had mandatory notification policies for leptospirosis.The sum of the median number of leptospirosis cases notified annually by the 24 countries/territories was 4 713.5, but just three countries (Brazil, Costa Rica, and Cuba) accounted for83.1% (3 920 cases) of the notifications. Eight (16.7%) countries reported deaths due to leptospirosis.The sum of the median number of deaths reported annually for the eight countrieswas 380, but 349 (91.8%) were reported by Brazil.Conclusions. Notification practices in the Americas for leptospirosis are limited. Therefore,the numbers of cases and deaths reported are not representative for the region. The lack ofleptospirosis data for many countries/territories may reflect weaknesses in certain aspects ofnational surveillance systems, including mandatory reporting policies, clinical laboratory infrastructurefor performing case confirmation, and capacity to collect reported cases. Improvedsurveillance of leptospirosis cases and deaths in the Americas is needed to allow monitoring ofregional epidemiological patterns and to estimate the burden of this important disease.