Medicina (Ribeiräo Preto); 50 (4), 2017
Publication year: 2017
Study design:
Cohort study Objective: Analyze the adverse reactions that occurred in Brazilian patients
with colorectal cancer submitted to chemotherapy with two different protocols, in order to identify
the types and severity of those most frequent recorded. Methods:
Sixty-three patients, who started
treatment from June 2014 to May 2015, were separated into two groups: mFOLFOX6 (protocol containing
oxaliplatin, folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil in bolus and continuous infusion, n= 40) and FOLFIRI
(protocol containing irinotecan, folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil in bolus and continuous infusions, n= 23).
Data related to the demographic and clinical profile of the patients were collected from the medical
record, as well as information about the treatment performed and the adverse reactions manifested.
The reactions were classified according to their severity (grades 1, 2, 3 and 4) and causality (definite,
probable, possible and doubtful). Results:
A high frequency of adverse reactions was observed in both
groups, reaching 92.5% of patients with mFOLFOX6 protocol and 95.6% with FOLFIRI protocol. Gastrointestinal
and neurological toxicities were the most frequent among the groups. When comparing the
occurrence of intergroup reactions, there was difference only for gastrointestinal toxicities (p= 0.035).
In 17.5% of patients mFOLFOX6 group (n= 7) and in 8.7% of patients FOLFIRI group (n= 2), grades 3
and 4 adverse reactions were observed and classified as probable. Conclusion:
The adverse reactions
were more diversified and frequent in the mFOLFOX6 group compared to the FOLFIRI group. However,
no difference was observed in the severity and causality of reactions in both groups (AU)
Study design:
Cohort study Objective: Analyze the adverse reactions that occurred in Brazilian patients
with colorectal cancer submitted to chemotherapy with two different protocols, in order to identify
the types and severity of those most frequent recorded. Methods:
Sixty-three patients, who started
treatment from June 2014 to May 2015, were separated into two groups: mFOLFOX6 (protocol containing
oxaliplatin, folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil in bolus and continuous infusion, n= 40) and FOLFIRI
(protocol containing irinotecan, folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil in bolus and continuous infusions, n= 23).
Data related to the demographic and clinical profile of the patients were collected from the medical
record, as well as information about the treatment performed and the adverse reactions manifested.
The reactions were classified according to their severity (grades 1, 2, 3 and 4) and causality (definite,
probable, possible and doubtful). Results:
A high frequency of adverse reactions was observed in both
groups, reaching 92.5% of patients with mFOLFOX6 protocol and 95.6% with FOLFIRI protocol. Gastrointestinal
and neurological toxicities were the most frequent among the groups. When comparing the
occurrence of intergroup reactions, there was difference only for gastrointestinal toxicities (p= 0.035).
In 17.5% of patients mFOLFOX6 group (n= 7) and in 8.7% of patients FOLFIRI group (n= 2), grades 3
and 4 adverse reactions were observed and classified as probable. Conclusion:
The adverse reactions
were more diversified and frequent in the mFOLFOX6 group compared to the FOLFIRI group. However,
no difference was observed in the severity and causality of reactions in both groups.(AU)