Malar. j. (Online); 18 (360), 2019
Ano de publicação: 2019
: Malaria remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in Mozambique. Increased investments
in malaria control have reduced the burden, but few studies have estimated the costs of malaria in the country. This
paper estimates the economic costs associated with malaria care to households and to the health system in the high
burden district of Mopeia in central Mozambique.
Methods:
Malaria care-seeking and morbidity costs were routinely collected among 1373 households with at least
one child enrolled in an active case detection (ACD) cohort in Mopeia, and through cross-sectional surveys with 824
families in 2017 and 805 families in 2018. Household costs included direct medical expenses, transportation and
opportunity costs of the time lost due to illness. Structured questionnaires were used to estimate the health system
costs associated with malaria care in all 13 district health facilities. Cost estimations followed an ingredient-based
approach with a top-down allocation approach for health system expenses.
Results:
Among participants in cross-sectional studies, households sought care for nine severe malaria cases requiring hospital admission and for 679 uncomplicated malaria cases. Median household costs associated with uncomplicated malaria among individuals of all ages were US$ 3.46 (IQR US$ 0.07–22.41) and US$ 81.08 (IQR US$ 39.34–88.38)
per severe case. Median household costs were lower among children under fve (ACD cohort): US$ 1.63 (IQR US$
0.00–7.79) per uncomplicated case and US$ 64.90 (IQR US$ 49.76–80.96) per severe case. Opportunity costs were
the main source of household costs. Median health system costs associated with malaria among patients of all ages
were US$ 4.34 (IQR US$ 4.32–4.35) per uncomplicated case and US$ 26.56 (IQR US$ 18.03–44.09) per severe case.
Considering household and health system costs, the overall cost of malaria care to society was US$ 7.80 per uncomplicated case and US$ 107.64 per severe case, representing an economic malaria burden of US$ 332,286.24 (IQR US$
186,355.84–1,091,212.90) per year only in Mopeia.
Conclusions:
Despite the provision of free malaria services, households in Mopeia incur signifcant direct and indirect costs associated with the disease. Furthermore, the high malaria cost on the Mozambican health system underscores the need to strengthen malaria prevention to reduce the high burden and improve productivity in the region