Ano de publicação: 2012
Teses e dissertações em Inglês apresentado à Korolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden para obtenção do título de Doutor. Orientador: Antai, Diddy
Background:
Intimate partner violence (IPV) against women is a widespread bad
behavior, and its effects on women’s lives encompass injuries, mental ill-health,
decreased intimacy, and a financial burden. Growing evidence indicates that women
also abuse their intimate male partners. The role of controlling behaviors in IPV
remains controversial, but data, mainly from Western countries, indicate that both
women and men use them. The situation (e.g., health condition) of women who have
been victims or perpetrators of IPV indicates that they may fare poorly in various areas
(e.g., have poorer mental health). The overall aim of this thesis is to investigate
women’s experiences of IPV as both victims and perpetrators, the associated risk and
protective factors, and the effects (including poor mental health).
Methods:
Data were collected between April 1, 2007 and March 31, 2008. They
consist in consecutive cases of 1,442 women aged 15-49 years-old visiting Forensic
Services at the Maputo Central Hospital (Maputo City, Mozambique) after IPV abuse.
Interviews were conducted by trained female interviewers, and the data collected
included demographic and life style factors, and previously validated in sub-Saharan
Africa (SSA) Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTC2) scores, Controlling Behavior
Scale Revised (CBS-R) scores, and Symptoms Check List (SCL-90-R) scores. Further,
Schedule for Social Interaction scores which had not been validated in SSA . Statistical
analyses included chi-square tests, and applications of bivariate and multivariate
techniques.
Results:
Study I: Overall experienced IPV during the past 12 months was 70.2% and
chronicity was 85.8 times; 55.3% were severe acts of violence. Co-occurring
victimization across all types was 26.8%. Having a middle/high educational level,
divorce/separation, children at home, controlling behaviors, being a perpetrator oneself
with co-occurring victimization, and childhood abuse were important factors in
explaining sustained IPV. Study II:
Overall inflicted IPV during the past 12 months was
69.4% and chronicity was 44.8 times; 48.9% were severe acts of violence. Co-
occurring perpetration of IPV across all types was 14.5%. Having a middle/high
educational level and a liberal profession/own business, divorce/separation, children at
home, and high BMI, smoking, controlling behaviors (in particular, over one’s partner),
co-occurring perpetration, being a victim oneself, and abuse as a child were important
factors in explaining the inflicting of IPV. Study III:
During the 12 past months, the
numbers of women and men who had directed any kind of physical assault at their
partner were similar, but there was divergence concerning the use of an act of sexual
coercion. The most common type of relationship was non-violent, followed by
situational couple violence (SCV). Childhood abuse was associated with mutual violent
control (MVC).Study IV:
Victims and perpetrators of IPV by type (psychological
aggression, physical assault, sexual coercion, and physical assault with injury) scored
higher on symptoms of depression, anxiety and somatization than their unaffected
counterparts during the previous 12 months. Controlling behaviors, mental health
comorbidity, childhood abuse, social support, smoking, sleep difficulties, age and lack
of education were important factors in explaining mental health problems in women
who were both victims and perpetrators of IPV across all types. Victimization and
perpetration were not associated with poor mental health across all types of IPV....